Our understanding of the production of space as a multifaceted interaction between our environment (Urban Hardware) and non-material processes in urban arena (Urban Software) raises doubts about possibility to create successful modes of spatial communication. In that sense, “cracking” is seen as a modification of the Urban Software (source code) which leads to unconventional spatial outcomes or newly formed social infrastructures.

The most important actors in the process of “cracking” come from domain of subculture. They possess different tactics developed as answers to urban uncertainty and the established social order. Hence, subculture is understood beyond definitions which describe it as opposition to dominant culture and commercially provided lifestyles. Subculture activities and actors are rather seen through the lens of their innovative character, unbound spaces they utilize and unconventional urban techniques they employ.

Furthermore, the evolution of subcultures towards “scenes” should be seen as a consequence of fundamental change of environment they resist. Nowadays subculture is able to generate a dialog with established systems of power and to turn their attention towards moderation and co-existence. This situation opens possibilities for new forms of “cracking” that are less subversive and more sophisticated.

By designing processes instead of buildings subcultures play significant role in repossession of public space and deconstruction of urban hierarchy. Particular attention is given to grass-root urban initiatives that use strategies of subculture to articulate their statements and obstruct certain urban developments.

Our platform and the open-source diagram as its engine are intended to identify subcultural geographies. They show radical aesthetic practices and associate them with territory rather then property. In the form of a monitoring graph, not intended for real-estate purposes, this archive records ephemeral nature of subcultures in presently accelerated urban environments and opens a needed discussion with public authorities about cases where newly formed social networks drastically improve the image of obsolete urban infrastructure.